And now for the grand finale! It’s Part Five of Eegah!
Enjoy the show!
Hi, this isn’t a review so much as a revisitation with a couple of movies I saw recently. One is Caged, which was on TCM Noir Alley with Eddie Mueller who gave a great introduction and told you all about stuff that I hadn’t known like the fact that none of the women in the movie wore makeup. That’s pretty radical for the times, to deglamorize yourself on screen. That took some guts, I think. And I think it was a gutsy move by everybody involved to make this movie because something I noticed this time that I didn’t really think about last time, there are a couple of things. First of all, these women are not necessarily hardened criminals and yet they’re involved in these criminal enterprises, mainly because they’re trying to get by, too. And so they have nothing good to say about men generally.
On the whole, most of what you hear when they talk about men is, “Oh men, they’ll just take you the wrong way. They’ll just lead you down the wrong path.” “I’ve never met a man that was any good for me,” and all this kind of stuff. Things like that. Not always, but a lot. And in fact, the protagonist, can’t think of her name offhand, unfortunately. The protagonist, a very sympatheticly played person, really good actor. Anyway, she only got imprisoned because she was convicted of aiding and abetting, I guess, in what turns out to be a felony murder, I think. No, no, no. It’s just a robbery. That’s right. It’s just a robbery. Okay. So it’s a robbery at gunpoint, I think. But the thing is, her husband’s dead now. It was her husband who was doing the robbery. And she was basically just trying to help him kind of keep control of the situation. She saw what was going on and tried to intervene in some way to her detriment.
So presumably without means to get a Perry Mason lawyer who will get her off magically or whatever. That’s being a bit dismissive, but sorry. But I was just struck by how men adversely affect women in this movie. And then I thought about the term caged, the whole concept of it. Women in prison.
Why are they in prison? Because they committed crimes. Why are they committing crimes? Because they need to eat. Their husbands haven’t been around. They haven’t been lucky enough to land Rosie the River jobs. Or if they had Rosie the River jobs, well, they’re gone. It’s post-World War II. Film noir is a male reaction on the whole to post the post-war home environment, which either felt stifling and conformist or felt discombobulating because they’d had to endure one thing, now they were back to this so-called normal environment. So yeah, imagine if you have a job in a factory, you’re making good money. You’re a woman. Your husband or boyfriend or whatever, your brother, whoever is off fighting a war. You’re praying that he won’t be killed or maimed. All those things. You’re suffering through rationing, but you’re making it because you’ve got a skill. You have a value to society and you’re contributing.
All the guys come back home. The war is over. Well, we need jobs, said soldiers, and women. Well, stay home. Stay home. We need jobs.
Well, you can see how the 50s came along, how that happened. How the 60s were the way they were with the huge emphasis on convenience, consumerism, spending, branding, Mad Men, all of it. So we created a narrative that didn’t sit well with a lot of women, and that led to the 70s, really. And that’s when really things started to change a little bit at the time. Very small increments, I have to tell you. And I think they’re still changing. I think we still have a ways to go. Having said that, let’s go to the second movie.
Death of a Cyclist. Okay. I wasn’t able to make the group meeting. Sorry, guys. Something happened. I went to a book signing instead, but … yeah, I don’t know what it was this time. I really felt close to the male figure in this one. I really could feel the conflicted nature of what the decision he had to make, but I couldn’t understand what he saw in the woman. In fact, I found her story tedious, boring. I found her to be tedious and boring. And apart from her obvious good looks, I thought, what does he see in her? There’s nothing there. There’s really nothing there. And the end is just laughable. I’m like, “Dude, she’s getting in the car. You’re standing by a fucking cliff and what’s going to happen next? Gee, I wonder. Is she going to run off with you to Timbuktu or Portugal or, I don’t know, the South of France? Australia?”
Australia. Yes. I don’t know, man. I just couldn’t get into the movie at all this time, except for the guy. Except for the guy in the student situation. That one I really cared about. I wanted to know more about that. I wanted to know more about him. To me, she was just like typical film noir. Femme fatale. Dull.
Sorry. I can see why the question of Franco and all that came up. I must have missed a really interesting discussion. Everybody’s talking about how interesting it is in these emails I’m getting. Oh, well, sorry guys. Maybe we should start recording these things. I have to stop myself from saying taping because no tape is involved in making this. No tape was involved in making this particular thing I’m doing right now. All right, that’s it then. This is not much better than the first take I did of this, but I think I may go with it. All right, thanks. Be seeing you.
Hi there! 🙂 Glad to be back. Glad to be anywhere, if you know what I mean.
This week, we have Part Four (which takes place mostly in a cave, so it’s a bit dark in more ways than one) of a film about a most unique individual named Eegah. I guess.
Support the noble cause of B-movie madness! And film noir!
And to my one paid member, at one time. My belated thanks!
Just got back from a trip to Santa Fe. Fortunately, we didn’t run into any oversized cavemen.
We also did not take a left turn at Albuquerque. 🙂

Hi. Today I’m doing a review of The Big Heat. Yeah, this was a good movie. I enjoyed it. It’s basically about the violence that people are capable of when under pressure. And yeah, Glenn Ford plays a cop. Bannion is his name.
And actually, I’ll just tell you, the movie starts off with a bang, literally. You see somebody at a desk, you really don’t get to see very much of him, just the back of his head. And then you see a hand pick up a gun and then a shot is fired. And then the person who was sitting there at this desk falls over dead, presumably. And at first I thought there was some sort of trick going on here where somebody else actually shot him. But no, no. The wife comes downstairs and that’s how much I notice shots these days. The wife comes downstairs, she sees hubby, dead, self-inflicted gunshot wound.
She calls somebody. The guy at the other end says, “I’m glad you called. First thing, remain calm. Second thing, call the police right the hell now.” Something like that. I don’t know what order it was. Maybe it was the other order. Maybe it was, “Call the police right the hell now and remain calm and don’t worry. Everything’s going to be fine.” So right away it’s like, “Yeah, why didn’t you just call the police?” So this person [the guy she calls] is obviously an influential person of some sort, but we don’t know how or why.
And then there are, as the police investigate this thing, Bannion is the one investigating. [Did I mention that the dead guy is a cop? No? Shame on me.] He gets conflicting stories from the widow. The widow says her husband was perfectly healthy and they had a great marriage. The girlfriend that this guy has been seeing says, “Nah, they were going to get divorced.” And no, he wasn’t perfectly healthy. [Yes, I got it bass ackwards. The wife said he was depressed and the girlfriend said he was just fine. In the pink, so to speak. But otherwise, it’s correct.]
So anyway, it’s interesting. It’s an interesting concept there. And you find out, yeah, yeah, there’s corruption beneath the surface. The whole, the crap floats to the top thing going on there. Yeah. Bad stuff is there. [I was going to mention something about “the blue line” or “a thin blue line” or something, but then I didn’t.] And you got Glenn Ford trying to deal with it. And oh yeah, the big kind of thematic take away from this movie is, I’m quoting a … I don’t know that this is a quote. It’s sort of a paraphrase of something I read somewhere else. [But I’m putting it in quotes, anyway. Whoa! Radical stuff!] “The Big Heat inverts the narrative paradigm making Glenn Ford the homme fatale whose contact with four women leads to their destruction.”
Yeah, that’s pretty much what it is. Yeah. That’s the noir of this. And there really isn’t so much of a femme fatale as a, I don’t know, just yet another roadblock to getting to the truth.
Oh, also, there’s Debbie played by Gloria Grahame, who I just love. I’ve always loved Gloria Grahame, no matter what character she plays in what movie, but I especially love her in this one. And I did want to note, I noticed that the guys in the group who were discussing this had a tendency to call her ditzy. I think we all overlooked the fact that she was drinking constantly.
Yeah. I mean, every time you saw her at first, during the first half of the movie, she had a pitcher of martinis or a martini glass in her hand and was constantly refilling it, flitting around and saying silly things. Well, that’s what happens when you’re drunk. You do really stupid, dumb things and you look ditzier than you are. So I don’t think she was ditzy as a character at all. I think she was young, dumb, and she mentioned she had been poor. So you can understand her attraction to somebody who has money. And unfortunately, she does not think through the consequences of that until hot coffee is thrown in her face.
So yeah, it’s that kind of movie. And I think it’s well worth watching. I love Glenn Ford in this, by the way. I just think he has a kind of Alan Ladd-ness about him. He has this kind of … It’s almost effortless the way he does it. He makes it look effortless anyhow. And yeah, Gloria Grahame, thumbs up all the way. Good movie. Go see it. Or just stream it or whatever the heck. Alrighty. Talk to you later. Be seeing you.
*****
Directed by Fritz Lang
Written by Sydney Boehm (based on the Saturday Evening Post serial and 1953 novel by William P. McGivern)
Produced by Robert Arthur
And here’s the trailer:
There are a few potential spoilers in there! 🙂
Hi there! 🙂 It’s time for Part Two of this amazing extravaganza!
According to Wikipedia, Eegah is often considered to be among the worst films ever made. It was also listed in the 1978 book The Fifty Worst Films of All Time, and was featured in a 1993 episode of Mystery Science Theater 3000 and a 2010 episode of Elvira’s Movie Macabre.
Enjoy the show!
Don’t forget to hit the concessions stand! 🙂
Be seeing you soon!
This week for your viewing pleasure, we have another movie that the MST3K crew took on.

So, I figured, why not? It’s easier than typing. 🙂
Maybe next time, I’ll actually prepare ahead. Anyone want to start a writers room? 🙂
Hi everyone. Today I’m going to do a review of Silent Life: The Story of the Lady in Black. I’m doing this because I heard about this movie when somebody sent me an invitation to basically get a, what do you call it? A preview link, whatever you call it, a reviewer’s link. So I feel that I really should say something about this movie because it’s worth seeing. It’s a very interesting experience for me because … Well, let me just tell you a little about the movie, which the description on IMDB seemed very odd to me. So here’s what I found. To me, this looked like, for one thing, it’s just technically beautiful, which you would expect about a movie made about Hollywood, by Hollywood.
But yeah, it’s gorgeous. And there’s this mysterious lady in black who shows up for Valentino’s funeral or memorial or whatever. So … it hardly matters. But anyway, I was trying to figure out who the protagonist was. And it’s the documentary maker who is making a documentary of this whole thing. This lady in black and the funeral itself and Valentino and all that. Anyway, that’s what it ends up being. It ends up being about Valentino as well as about this filmmaker who wants to talk about to this lady in black and understand her. It’s about the lady in black too. It’s about a lot of things. I have so many notes. I could not possibly just take all the [I hold up my notebook, at this point] … I wish I could just stuff this into ChatGPT and say, “Go to it. ” But I got to tell you, the things I loved about the movie, I loved the technical beauty of it.
I loved the acting. There were some great actors in this thing. Oh, I have a note here. “Sherilyn Fenn is AWESOME!” (I am quoting exactly as I wrote it in my notes.) There, I said it. Sherilyn Fenn is awesome. And the guy who plays Valentino, wonderful. Just wonderful acting. I mean, basically this movie has everything a movie should have. And you get it from the old lady’s perspective. That’s the thing. That’s the thing I kept thinking. Okay, this is coming from the old lady. This is coming from the old lady. I know this. I’m a writer. I know this. I’m also now a filmmaker, apparently. Okay. Having said that, the most minor of filmmakers, I might add. I mean, I’ve made one short film and it’s not even damn finished at this point, but it’s getting there. It really, really is getting there. Okay. So anyway, anyway, I really did love this movie because it has everything that a Hollywood movie should have.
It has the hard luck struggling immigrant story that Valentino came over and he was literally homeless and trying to figure out what to do. Couldn’t speak the language, all that stuff. Okay. So he’s struggling. He decides he’s going to stick with it anyway. Finds a guy who ends up being a gigolo basically and teaches him how to be a gigolo. “You have these wonderful eyes” (so he is told, by his “mentor”) and he does things with his eyes that just captivate women and blah, blah, blah. And this lady who’s telling the story was a nurse on the night that he made his premiere, his movie made a premiere or something. Anyway, so allegedly she was there when Valentino had some kind of horrible health issue. Anyway, the whole of the story is very, it’s captivating. You have really interesting technical things going on with the color.
I won’t go into detail. It’s better to watch it and appreciate it and look for those color changes because they’re significant. And the other thing I was going to say was, what else was I going to say? Oh, it reminded me of Beatlemania, the way the women responded to Valentino. It reminded me of Beatlemania. But it also was extremely interesting to look at the closeups of the women as they’re watching Valentino. I mean, it’s like, it’s as if they’re having sex with him right there in the theater. That’s the way they look. Or certainly they’re thinking about it. Boy, are they thinking about it and making it clear with their faces. People back then had faces.
I’m starting to sound like Gloria Swanson. Oh, that’s creepy. Okay. What else did I want to say? Oh, there’s a … Of course, somewhere in there, they have to do “Happy Days Are Here Again”. Ironically, of course. I love when they do that. That’s another nice Hollywood standard, right? No business like show business, eh? Let me see what else. “Lots of old time debauchery.” (Yes, I’m quoting, verbatim, from what I wrote in my hastily-scribbled notes.) What happened here? I don’t know. Oh, “Sherilyn Fenn is awesome!” I’ll just say it again. She is. “Cinema is about teamwork.” I really like that quote, because it really is. And that’s what I love about it, actually. It gives you the opportunity to work with other people. And it’s just a great business that way. I mean, some people would say, “Oh, it’s an awful business that way,” because it’s all nepotism. No, talent can help you a little bit, really.
And actually working at it and trying to be really good at it. Oh, I’m going off on more than just a review here, aren’t I? I’m too involved. I’m too close to what’s going on up there to maybe be rational or, I don’t know, what’s the word, objective about it.
But I really did think this movie was very interesting and not entirely … I won’t say entirely predictable, but it has the kind of ending I would have expected. (You could say it has an appropriate and thoughtful resolution. Damn! If only I’d actually said that.) And this person is very interesting. So I’m trying to think. I was thinking, this isn’t so much a documentary he’s making as an oral history and there’s a difference between an oral history and a documentary. It’s like the difference between documentary and journalism. The closer you get to the truth, the more it’s like journalism or should be, she said. Anyway, the farther you get from that, the more you get to the personal, the more it becomes like a memoir, which means that not everything you hear might be true. But the point is, it was told, it was somebody’s story. This is her story about somebody else’s story. So it’s interesting that way. And there is a flashback within a flashback, which I also found amusing.
People get on me about my flashbacks. Yeah, what can I say? I love them. Anyway, nicely done, and I enjoyed the movie very much. And if you’re into movies about celebrity, the price of fame, the heartlessness of New York, or the joys of the cinema, I don’t know. Anyway, if you like movies and you like watching celebrities make them, this is a great movie to see, and I enjoyed it a lot. I really did. So take care and I will talk to you later. Assuming you still want to listen to me. Be seeing you!
*****
That’s a nice, solid rating of approval. Without outright pandering. 🙂
Directed by Vladislav Alex Kozlov
Written by Ksenia Jarova, Natalia Dar Kozlov, and Vladislav Alex Kozlov
Produced by Vladislav Alex Kozlov
PS: This is one of the most moving trailers I’ve seen in a while.
Isabella! God, you’re beautiful! You’re awesome! Terry! You nailed it! 🙂
Damn near busted out crying at the end of the damn trailer!
Someday, I’ll figure out Patreon!
PPS: Next time, The Big Heat!

While I don’t have a movie or review today, I just saw another movie I enjoyed enough to go on a bit about review it . The Big Heat with Glenn Ford, Gloria Graham, and Lee Marvin, directed by Fritz Lang.
Did you know this was based on a series of articles in The Saturday Evening Post which, in turn, were adapted into a novel?
I’ll have a review of the movie for you soon!
What I’d really like to do is start a movie-related book club. It wouldn’t have to meet on Saturday, but we could do it then.
I’m particularly interested in how books and other media get reworked into cinematic stories.
It’s a process that, in the past, many authors have outright disliked. However, many authors these days (established and newbie) are actively interested in having their work adapted for some medium or other. Whether movies, TV, podcast, video game, or what-have-you.
It would be interesting to take a look at say, The Maltese Falcon, and compare the movie with the novel. If you’ve never read the novel, I’ve been posting it here.
Let’s just say the novel’s ending is a lot more noir than the movie’s. 🙂
PS: Here’s a review of The Big Heat that’ll warm you up for my review!
Look, ma! No femme fatale! 🙂
PPS: In lieu of a movie and speaking of adaptations, here’s an episode of the Crime Cafe that features a Philip Marlowe story! And you can’t have too much Philip Marlowe. 🙂
Also, I’m still in the process of reading this book. It’s taking a while, for a number of reasons, not the least of which is that I’m trying to catch up on reading a huge pile of books in print and digital. So, I seriously need to cut back on something or maybe just keep making videos. Who knows? 🙂
PPPS: May the spirit of Pauline Kael be with you! 🙂
At last Here we are, at the end of this movie. I hope we’ve all learned something from this.
The Beatniks isn’t a particularly good movie. But it was good enough for the MST3K fellas, so … there’s that.
And that’s all she wrote. 🙂